How we make decisions
Distributing decision making across our whole membership
The philosophy for our decision-making at MICO is: 'Good enough for now, safe enough to try'. This removes tension created by pressure to find the perfect solutions, promotes innovation and allows responsiveness to
changing conditions.
​
We distribute all the work it takes to plan and build a cohousing development across a number of 'Working Groups' (as shown in the diagram below) but meet regularly as a full Membership - particularly when we need to make important decisions that affect all members.
​
​
To make decisions, MICO uses a combination of 'consensus' and 'consent' methods for non-hierarchical decision making, depending on what decision is being made. Traditional majority voting processes can leave some people feeling unheard, frustrated and overruled.
In contrast, consensus is a way of making decisions that helps ensure everyone’s voice is heard and valued and that everyone can support the decision. The eventual decisions tend to have more buy-in from everyone involved.
Consent is a form of consensus, but the focus is on 'no-one objecting' rather than 'everyone agreeing' so there is scope for decisions to be made more quickly and action to happen.
​
You can find out more about these more consensual ways of making decisions at Seeds For Change.
​
You can find our full documentation on how we make decisions here.